Files
feynman/prompts/lit.md
Advait Paliwal f5570b4e5a Rename .pi to .feynman, rename citation agent to verifier, add website, skills, and docs
- Rename project config dir from .pi/ to .feynman/ (Pi supports this via piConfig.configDir)
- Rename citation agent to verifier across all prompts, agents, skills, and docs
- Add website with homepage and 24 doc pages (Astro + Tailwind)
- Add skills for all workflows (deep-research, lit, review, audit, replicate, compare, draft, autoresearch, watch, jobs, session-log, agentcomputer)
- Add Pi-native prompt frontmatter (args, section, topLevelCli) and read at runtime
- Remove sync-docs generation layer — docs are standalone
- Remove metadata/prompts.mjs and metadata/packages.mjs — not needed at runtime
- Rewrite README and homepage copy
- Add environment selection to /replicate before executing
- Add prompts/delegate.md and AGENTS.md

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-03-23 17:35:35 -07:00

16 lines
1.1 KiB
Markdown

---
description: Run a literature review on a topic using paper search and primary-source synthesis.
args: <topic>
section: Research Workflows
topLevelCli: true
---
Investigate the following topic as a literature review: $@
## Workflow
1. **Gather** — Use the `researcher` subagent when the sweep is wide enough to benefit from delegated paper triage before synthesis. For narrow topics, search directly.
2. **Synthesize** — Separate consensus, disagreements, and open questions. When useful, propose concrete next experiments or follow-up reading.
3. **Cite** — Spawn the `verifier` agent to add inline citations and verify every source URL in the draft.
4. **Verify** — Spawn the `reviewer` agent to check the cited draft for unsupported claims, logical gaps, and single-source critical findings. Fix FATAL issues before delivering. Note MAJOR issues in Open Questions.
5. **Deliver** — Save exactly one literature review to `outputs/` as markdown. Write a provenance record alongside it as `<filename>.provenance.md` listing: date, sources consulted vs. accepted vs. rejected, verification status, and intermediate research files used.