Files
feynman/prompts/lit.md
Advait Paliwal f5570b4e5a Rename .pi to .feynman, rename citation agent to verifier, add website, skills, and docs
- Rename project config dir from .pi/ to .feynman/ (Pi supports this via piConfig.configDir)
- Rename citation agent to verifier across all prompts, agents, skills, and docs
- Add website with homepage and 24 doc pages (Astro + Tailwind)
- Add skills for all workflows (deep-research, lit, review, audit, replicate, compare, draft, autoresearch, watch, jobs, session-log, agentcomputer)
- Add Pi-native prompt frontmatter (args, section, topLevelCli) and read at runtime
- Remove sync-docs generation layer — docs are standalone
- Remove metadata/prompts.mjs and metadata/packages.mjs — not needed at runtime
- Rewrite README and homepage copy
- Add environment selection to /replicate before executing
- Add prompts/delegate.md and AGENTS.md

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-03-23 17:35:35 -07:00

1.1 KiB

description, args, section, topLevelCli
description args section topLevelCli
Run a literature review on a topic using paper search and primary-source synthesis. <topic> Research Workflows true

Investigate the following topic as a literature review: $@

Workflow

  1. Gather — Use the researcher subagent when the sweep is wide enough to benefit from delegated paper triage before synthesis. For narrow topics, search directly.
  2. Synthesize — Separate consensus, disagreements, and open questions. When useful, propose concrete next experiments or follow-up reading.
  3. Cite — Spawn the verifier agent to add inline citations and verify every source URL in the draft.
  4. Verify — Spawn the reviewer agent to check the cited draft for unsupported claims, logical gaps, and single-source critical findings. Fix FATAL issues before delivering. Note MAJOR issues in Open Questions.
  5. Deliver — Save exactly one literature review to outputs/ as markdown. Write a provenance record alongside it as <filename>.provenance.md listing: date, sources consulted vs. accepted vs. rejected, verification status, and intermediate research files used.