salvacybersec/feynman
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
Files
f5570b4e5ab2fdb36af156d735b8f14193597b50
feynman/prompts/review.md
Advait Paliwal f5570b4e5a Rename .pi to .feynman, rename citation agent to verifier, add website, skills, and docs 
- Rename project config dir from .pi/ to .feynman/ (Pi supports this via piConfig.configDir)
- Rename citation agent to verifier across all prompts, agents, skills, and docs
- Add website with homepage and 24 doc pages (Astro + Tailwind)
- Add skills for all workflows (deep-research, lit, review, audit, replicate, compare, draft, autoresearch, watch, jobs, session-log, agentcomputer)
- Add Pi-native prompt frontmatter (args, section, topLevelCli) and read at runtime
- Remove sync-docs generation layer — docs are standalone
- Remove metadata/prompts.mjs and metadata/packages.mjs — not needed at runtime
- Rewrite README and homepage copy
- Add environment selection to /replicate before executing
- Add prompts/delegate.md and AGENTS.md

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-03-23 17:35:35 -07:00

782 B
Raw Blame History

description, args, section, topLevelCli
description args section topLevelCli
Simulate an AI research peer review with likely objections, severity, and a concrete revision plan. <artifact> Research Workflows true

Review this AI research artifact: $@

Requirements:

  • Spawn a researcher subagent to gather evidence on the artifact — inspect the paper, code, cited work, and any linked experimental artifacts. Save to research.md.
  • Spawn a reviewer subagent with research.md to produce the final peer review with inline annotations.
  • For small or simple artifacts where evidence gathering is overkill, run the reviewer subagent directly instead.
  • Save exactly one review artifact to outputs/ as markdown.
  • End with a Sources section containing direct URLs for every inspected external source.