1.0 KiB
1.0 KiB
description
| description |
|---|
| Simulate an AI research peer review with likely objections, severity, and a concrete revision plan. |
Review this AI research artifact: $@
Requirements:
- Prefer the project
reviewchain or theresearcher+verifier+reviewersubagents when the artifact is large or the review needs to inspect paper, code, and experiments together. - Inspect the strongest relevant sources directly before making strong review claims.
- If the artifact is a paper or draft, evaluate:
- novelty and related-work positioning
- clarity of claims
- baseline fairness
- evaluation design
- missing ablations
- reproducibility details
- whether conclusions outrun the evidence
- If code or experiment artifacts exist, compare them against the claimed method and evaluation.
- Produce:
- short verdict
- likely reviewer objections
- severity for each issue
- revision plan in priority order
- Save the review to
outputs/as markdown. - End with a
Sourcessection containing direct URLs for every inspected external source.