55 lines
1.6 KiB
Markdown
55 lines
1.6 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
name: deep-research
|
|
description: Use this when the user wants a broad, thorough investigation with strong sourcing, explicit evidence tables, and a durable research brief.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Deep Research
|
|
|
|
## When To Use
|
|
|
|
Use this skill when the user wants:
|
|
- a thorough investigation rather than a quick memo
|
|
- a broad landscape analysis
|
|
- careful source comparison across multiple source types
|
|
- a durable research brief with explicit evidence
|
|
|
|
## Procedure
|
|
|
|
1. Clarify the exact scope and what decision or question the research should support.
|
|
2. Choose the right retrieval mix:
|
|
- use `web_search` and `fetch_content` first for current, product, market, regulatory, or latest topics
|
|
- use `alpha_search`, `alpha_get_paper`, and `alpha_ask_paper` for academic background or paper-centric claims
|
|
- use both when the topic spans current reality and academic literature
|
|
3. Gather enough high-quality sources before synthesizing.
|
|
4. Build an evidence table covering:
|
|
- source
|
|
- claim
|
|
- evidence type
|
|
- caveats
|
|
- relevance
|
|
5. Synthesize:
|
|
- strongest findings
|
|
- disagreements
|
|
- open questions
|
|
- what would change the conclusion
|
|
6. Save a durable markdown brief to `outputs/`.
|
|
7. End with a `Sources` section containing direct URLs for every source used.
|
|
|
|
## Pitfalls
|
|
|
|
- Do not answer a current topic from papers alone.
|
|
- Do not answer an academic topic from search snippets alone.
|
|
- Do not collapse disagreement into fake consensus.
|
|
- Do not omit the evidence table on broad or high-stakes topics.
|
|
|
|
## Deliverable
|
|
|
|
Include:
|
|
- scope
|
|
- evidence table
|
|
- key findings
|
|
- disagreements or caveats
|
|
- open questions
|
|
- recommendation or next step
|
|
- sources
|