salvacybersec/feynman
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
Files
7ef1ca2859a9e1469f8d10dd5bfda117452cbec0
feynman/prompts/review.md
Advait Paliwal a452cd95b8 Add plan-confirm steps to all workflows, cite alphaXiv and Agent Computer, add visuals to writer 
- Every workflow prompt now shows a plan and asks the user to confirm before executing
- /autoresearch asks for execution environment (local, branch, venv, cloud) and confirms before looping
- Writer agent and key prompts now generate charts (pi-charts) and diagrams (Mermaid) when data calls for it
- Cite alphaXiv and Agent Computer in README and website homepage
- Clear terminal screen before launching Pi TUI
- Remove Alpha Hub GitHub link in favor of alphaxiv.org

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-03-23 17:45:26 -07:00

977 B
Raw Blame History

description, args, section, topLevelCli
description args section topLevelCli
Simulate an AI research peer review with likely objections, severity, and a concrete revision plan. <artifact> Research Workflows true

Review this AI research artifact: $@

Requirements:

  • Before starting, outline what will be reviewed and the review criteria (novelty, empirical rigor, baselines, reproducibility, etc.). Present the plan to the user and confirm before proceeding.
  • Spawn a researcher subagent to gather evidence on the artifact — inspect the paper, code, cited work, and any linked experimental artifacts. Save to research.md.
  • Spawn a reviewer subagent with research.md to produce the final peer review with inline annotations.
  • For small or simple artifacts where evidence gathering is overkill, run the reviewer subagent directly instead.
  • Save exactly one review artifact to outputs/ as markdown.
  • End with a Sources section containing direct URLs for every inspected external source.