a452cd95b8
- Every workflow prompt now shows a plan and asks the user to confirm before executing - /autoresearch asks for execution environment (local, branch, venv, cloud) and confirms before looping - Writer agent and key prompts now generate charts (pi-charts) and diagrams (Mermaid) when data calls for it - Cite alphaXiv and Agent Computer in README and website homepage - Clear terminal screen before launching Pi TUI - Remove Alpha Hub GitHub link in favor of alphaxiv.org Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
1.4 KiB
1.4 KiB
description, args, section, topLevelCli
| description | args | section | topLevelCli |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run a literature review on a topic using paper search and primary-source synthesis. | <topic> | Research Workflows | true |
Investigate the following topic as a literature review: $@
Workflow
- Plan — Outline the scope: key questions, source types to search (papers, web, repos), time period, and expected sections. Present the plan to the user and confirm before proceeding.
- Gather — Use the
researchersubagent when the sweep is wide enough to benefit from delegated paper triage before synthesis. For narrow topics, search directly. - Synthesize — Separate consensus, disagreements, and open questions. When useful, propose concrete next experiments or follow-up reading. Generate charts with
pi-chartsfor quantitative comparisons across papers and Mermaid diagrams for taxonomies or method pipelines. - Cite — Spawn the
verifieragent to add inline citations and verify every source URL in the draft. - Verify — Spawn the
revieweragent to check the cited draft for unsupported claims, logical gaps, and single-source critical findings. Fix FATAL issues before delivering. Note MAJOR issues in Open Questions. - Deliver — Save exactly one literature review to
outputs/as markdown. Write a provenance record alongside it as<filename>.provenance.mdlisting: date, sources consulted vs. accepted vs. rejected, verification status, and intermediate research files used.