feynman/prompts/review.md

description

description
Simulate an AI research peer review with likely objections, severity, and a concrete revision plan.

Review this AI research artifact: $@

Requirements:

• Prefer the project review chain or the researcher + verifier + reviewer subagents when the artifact is large or the review needs to inspect paper, code, and experiments together.
• Inspect the strongest relevant sources directly before making strong review claims.
• If the artifact is a paper or draft, evaluate:
  • novelty and related-work positioning
  • clarity of claims
  • baseline fairness
  • evaluation design
  • missing ablations
  • reproducibility details
  • whether conclusions outrun the evidence
• If code or experiment artifacts exist, compare them against the claimed method and evaluation.
• Produce:
  • short verdict
  • likely reviewer objections
  • severity for each issue
  • revision plan in priority order
• Save exactly one review artifact to outputs/ as markdown.
• End with a Sources section containing direct URLs for every inspected external source.