feynman/prompts/rebuttal.md

description

description
Turn reviewer comments into a structured rebuttal and revision plan for an AI research paper.

Prepare a rebuttal workflow for: $@

Requirements:

• If reviewer comments are provided, organize them into a response matrix.
• If reviewer comments are not yet provided, infer the likely strongest objections from the current draft and review them before drafting responses.
• Prefer the reviewer subagent or the project review chain when fresh critical review is still needed.
• For each issue, produce:
  • reviewer concern
  • whether it is valid
  • evidence available now
  • paper changes needed
  • rebuttal language
• Do not overclaim fixes that have not been implemented.
• Save exactly one rebuttal matrix to outputs/ as markdown.
• End with a Sources section containing direct URLs for all inspected external sources.