Reframe Feynman for general research workflows

skills/research/literature-review/SKILL.md

@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ Use this skill when the user wants:
    - what remains unresolved
 7. If the user wants a durable artifact, write a markdown brief to disk.
 8. If you discover an important gotcha about a paper, save it with `alpha_annotate_paper`.
+9. End with a `Sources` section that lists direct URLs, not just titles.
 
 ## Pitfalls
 
@@ -50,3 +51,4 @@ Prefer this structure:
 - disagreements or caveats
 - open questions
 - recommended next reading or experiments
+- sources

skills/research/paper-code-audit/SKILL.md

@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ Use this skill for:
 6. Record concrete mismatches, not vibes.
 7. Save the audit in `outputs/`.
 8. If you find a durable gotcha, save it with `alpha_annotate_paper`.
+9. End with a `Sources` section for the paper and repository.
 
 ## Pitfalls
 
@@ -48,3 +49,4 @@ Include:
 - mismatches or omissions
 - reproducibility risks
 - recommended next actions
+- sources

skills/research/paper-writing/SKILL.md

@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ Use this skill for:
 4. Use LaTeX only where equations or notation genuinely improve clarity.
 5. Keep claims falsifiable and scoped.
 6. Save polished drafts to `papers/`.
+7. Add a `Sources` appendix with direct URLs to all inspected references.
 
 ## Pitfalls
 

skills/research/reading-list/SKILL.md

@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ Use this skill for:
    - move to strongest methods
    - finish with edges, critiques, or adjacent work
 6. Write the final list as a durable markdown artifact in `outputs/`.
+7. For every paper, include a direct URL.
 
 ## Pitfalls
 

skills/research/research-memo/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+---
+name: research-memo
+description: Use this when the user wants a source-grounded memo, briefing, landscape summary, or background note that is broader than a single paper.
+---
+
+# Research Memo
+
+## When To Use
+
+Use this skill for:
+- background research
+- topic briefings
+- market or field overviews
+- synthesis across multiple sources
+- internal memos that need traceable evidence
+
+## Procedure
+
+1. Find relevant sources first.
+2. Inspect the strongest sources directly before synthesizing.
+3. Separate:
+   - established facts
+   - plausible inferences
+   - unresolved questions
+4. Write a memo with clear sections and a concise narrative.
+5. End with a `Sources` section containing direct links.
+6. Save the memo to `outputs/` when the user wants a durable artifact.
+
+## Pitfalls
+
+- Do not summarize from search snippets alone.
+- Do not omit the source list.
+- Do not present inference as fact.
+
+## Deliverable
+
+Include:
+- topic
+- key findings
+- disagreements or caveats
+- open questions
+- sources

skills/research/source-comparison/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+---
+name: source-comparison
+description: Use this when the task is to compare multiple papers, reports, or sources and produce a grounded matrix of agreements, disagreements, and confidence.
+---
+
+# Source Comparison
+
+## When To Use
+
+Use this skill for:
+- comparing papers on the same topic
+- reconciling conflicting claims
+- assessing multiple sources before making a recommendation
+- producing evidence matrices
+
+## Procedure
+
+1. Find and inspect the strongest relevant sources first.
+2. For each source, extract:
+   - main claim
+   - evidence type
+   - caveats
+   - what would falsify or weaken the claim
+3. Build a comparison table or matrix.
+4. Separate:
+   - points of agreement
+   - points of disagreement
+   - unresolved questions
+5. End with a `Sources` section containing direct URLs.
+
+## Pitfalls
+
+- Do not compare sources you have not actually opened.
+- Do not blur disagreement into consensus.
+- Do not omit source links.
+
+## Deliverable
+
+Include:
+- matrix
+- agreement summary
+- disagreement summary
+- confidence assessment
+- sources