diff --git a/strix/prompts/frameworks/nextjs.jinja b/strix/prompts/frameworks/nextjs.jinja
index dc8179d..ddd2ce4 100644
--- a/strix/prompts/frameworks/nextjs.jinja
+++ b/strix/prompts/frameworks/nextjs.jinja
@@ -31,6 +31,18 @@
 </high_value_targets>
 
 <advanced_techniques>
+<route_enumeration>
+- __BUILD_MANIFEST.sortedPages: Execute `console.log(__BUILD_MANIFEST.sortedPages.join('\n'))` in browser console to instantly reveal all registered routes (Pages Router and static App Router paths compiled at build time)
+- __NEXT_DATA__: Inspect `<script id="__NEXT_DATA__">` for serverside props, pageProps, buildId, and dynamic route params on current page; reveals data flow and prop structure
+- Source maps exposure: Check `/_next/static/` for exposed .map files revealing full route structure, server action IDs, API endpoints, and internal function names
+- Client bundle mining: Search main-*.js and page chunks for route definitions; grep for 'pathname:', 'href:', '__next_route__', 'serverActions', and API endpoint strings
+- Static chunk enumeration: Probe `/_next/static/chunks/pages/` and `/_next/static/chunks/app/` for build artifacts; filenames map directly to routes (e.g., `admin.js` → `/admin`)
+- Build manifest fetch: GET `/_next/static/<buildId>/_buildManifest.js` and `/_next/static/<buildId>/_ssgManifest.js` for complete route and static generation metadata
+- Sitemap/robots leakage: Check `/sitemap.xml`, `/robots.txt`, and `/sitemap-*.xml` for unintended exposure of admin/internal/preview paths
+- Server action discovery: Inspect Network tab for POST requests with `Next-Action` header; extract action IDs from response streams and client hydration data
+- Environment variable leakage: Execute `Object.keys(process.env).filter(k => k.startsWith('NEXT_PUBLIC_'))` in console to list public env vars; grep bundles for 'API_KEY', 'SECRET', 'TOKEN', 'PASSWORD' to find accidentally leaked credentials
+</route_enumeration>
+
 <middleware_bypass>
 - Test for CVE-class middleware bypass via `x-middleware-subrequest` crafting and `x-nextjs-data` probing. Look for 307 + `x-middleware-rewrite`/`x-nextjs-redirect` headers and attempt bypass on protected routes.
 - Attempt direct route access on Node vs Edge runtimes; confirm protection parity.
@@ -80,6 +92,14 @@
 - Identify `dangerouslySetInnerHTML`, Markdown renderers, and user-controlled href/src attributes. Validate CSP/Trusted Types coverage for SSR/CSR/hydration.
 - Attack hydration boundaries: server vs client render mismatches can enable gadget-based XSS.
 </client_and_dom>
+
+<data_fetching_over_exposure>
+- getServerSideProps/getStaticProps leakage: Execute `JSON.parse(document.getElementById('__NEXT_DATA__').textContent).props.pageProps` in console to inspect all server-fetched data; look for sensitive fields (emails, tokens, internal IDs, full user objects) passed to client but not rendered in UI
+- Over-fetched database queries: Check if pageProps include entire user records, relations, or admin-only fields when only username is displayed; common when using ORM select-all patterns
+- API response pass-through: Verify if API responses are sanitized before passing to props; developers often forward entire responses including metadata, cursors, or debug info
+- Environment-dependent data: Test if staging/dev accidentally exposes more fields in props than production due to inconsistent serialization logic
+- Nested object inspection: Drill into nested props objects; look for `_metadata`, `_internal`, `__typename` (GraphQL), or framework-added fields containing sensitive context
+</data_fetching_over_exposure>
 </advanced_techniques>
 
 <bypass_techniques>
@@ -87,6 +107,8 @@
 - Method override/tunneling: `_method`, `X-HTTP-Method-Override`, GET on endpoints unexpectedly accepting writes.
 - Case/param aliasing and query duplication affecting middleware vs handler parsing.
 - Cache key confusion at CDN/proxy (lack of Vary on auth cookies/headers) to leak personalized SSR/ISR content.
+- API route path normalization: Test `/api/users` vs `/api/users/` vs `/api//users` vs `/api/./users`; middleware may normalize differently than route handlers, allowing protection bypass. Try double slashes, trailing slashes, and dot segments.
+- Parameter pollution: Send duplicate query params (`?id=1&id=2`) or array notation (`?filter[]=a&filter[]=b`) to exploit parsing differences between middleware (which may check first value) and handler (which may use last or array).
 </bypass_techniques>
 
 <special_contexts>
@@ -107,6 +129,10 @@
 3. Demonstrate server action invocation outside UI with insufficient authorization checks.
 4. Show middleware bypass (where applicable) with explicit headers and resulting protected content.
 5. Include runtime parity checks (Edge vs Node) proving inconsistent enforcement.
+6. For route enumeration: verify discovered routes return 200/403 (deployed) not 404 (build artifacts); test with authenticated vs unauthenticated requests.
+7. For leaked credentials: test API keys with minimal read-only calls; filter placeholders (YOUR_API_KEY, demo-token); confirm keys match provider patterns (sk_live_*, pk_prod_*).
+8. For __NEXT_DATA__ over-exposure: test cross-user (User A's props should not contain User B's PII); verify exposed fields are not in DOM; validate token validity with API calls.
+9. For path normalization bypasses: show differential responses (403 vs 200 for path variants); redirects (307/308) don't count—only direct access bypasses matter.
 </validation>
 
 <pro_tips>