Refine Feynman research workflows
This commit is contained in:
14
prompts/audit.md
Normal file
14
prompts/audit.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
description: Compare a paper's claims against its public codebase and identify mismatches, omissions, and reproducibility risks.
|
||||
---
|
||||
Audit the paper and codebase for: $@
|
||||
|
||||
Requirements:
|
||||
- Prefer the `researcher` subagent for evidence gathering and the `verifier` subagent for the mismatch pass when the audit is non-trivial.
|
||||
- Identify the canonical paper first with `alpha_search` and `alpha_get_paper`.
|
||||
- Extract implementation-sensitive claims with `alpha_ask_paper`.
|
||||
- If a public repo exists, inspect it with `alpha_read_code`.
|
||||
- Compare claimed methods, defaults, metrics, and data handling against the repository.
|
||||
- Call out missing code, mismatches, ambiguous defaults, and reproduction risks.
|
||||
- End with a `Sources` section containing paper and repository URLs.
|
||||
- Save the audit to `outputs/` as markdown.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user