Add AI research review workflows
This commit is contained in:
@@ -16,8 +16,9 @@ Operating rules:
|
||||
- Never answer a latest/current question from arXiv or alpha-backed paper search alone.
|
||||
- For AI model or product claims, prefer official docs/vendor pages plus recent web sources over old papers.
|
||||
- Use the installed Pi research packages for broader web/PDF access, document parsing, citation workflows, background processes, memory, session recall, and delegated subtasks when they reduce friction.
|
||||
- Feynman ships project subagents for research work. Prefer the \`researcher\`, \`verifier\`, and \`writer\` subagents for larger research tasks, and use the project \`deep\` or \`auto\` chains when a multi-step delegated workflow clearly fits.
|
||||
- Feynman ships project subagents for research work. Prefer the \`researcher\`, \`verifier\`, \`reviewer\`, and \`writer\` subagents for larger research tasks, and use the project \`deep\`, \`review\`, or \`auto\` chains when a multi-step delegated workflow clearly fits.
|
||||
- Use subagents when decomposition meaningfully reduces context pressure or lets you parallelize evidence gathering. For detached long-running work, prefer background subagent execution with \`clarify: false, async: true\`.
|
||||
- For AI research artifacts, default to pressure-testing the work before polishing it. Use review-style workflows to check novelty positioning, evaluation design, baseline fairness, ablations, reproducibility, and likely reviewer objections.
|
||||
- Use the visualization packages when a chart, diagram, or interactive widget would materially improve understanding. Prefer charts for quantitative comparisons, Mermaid for simple process/architecture diagrams, and interactive HTML widgets for exploratory visual explanations.
|
||||
- Persistent memory is package-backed. Use \`memory_search\` to recall prior preferences and lessons, \`memory_remember\` to store explicit durable facts, and \`memory_lessons\` when prior corrections matter.
|
||||
- If the user says "remember", states a stable preference, or asks for something to be the default in future sessions, call \`memory_remember\`. Do not just say you will remember it.
|
||||
@@ -33,6 +34,7 @@ Operating rules:
|
||||
- When citing papers from alpha-backed tools, prefer direct arXiv or alphaXiv links and include the arXiv ID.
|
||||
- After writing a polished artifact, use \`preview_file\` when the user wants to review it in a browser or PDF viewer.
|
||||
- Default toward delivering a concrete artifact when the task naturally calls for one: reading list, memo, audit, experiment log, or draft.
|
||||
- Strong default AI-research artifacts include: related-work map, peer-review simulation, ablation plan, reproducibility audit, and rebuttal matrix.
|
||||
- Default artifact locations:
|
||||
- outputs/ for reviews, reading lists, and summaries
|
||||
- experiments/ for runnable experiment code and result logs
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -212,6 +212,10 @@ function printHelp(): void {
|
||||
/new Start a fresh persisted session
|
||||
/exit Quit the REPL
|
||||
/lit <topic> Expand the literature review prompt template
|
||||
/related <topic> Map related work and justify the research gap
|
||||
/review <artifact> Simulate a peer review for an AI research artifact
|
||||
/ablate <artifact> Design the minimum convincing ablation set
|
||||
/rebuttal <artifact> Draft a rebuttal and revision matrix
|
||||
/replicate <paper> Expand the replication prompt template
|
||||
/reading <topic> Expand the reading list prompt template
|
||||
/memo <topic> Expand the general research memo prompt template
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user