Add AI research review workflows

prompts/review.md

@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+---
+description: Simulate an AI research peer review with likely objections, severity, and a concrete revision plan.
+---
+Review this AI research artifact: $@
+
+Requirements:
+- Prefer the project `review` chain or the `researcher` + `verifier` + `reviewer` subagents when the artifact is large or the review needs to inspect paper, code, and experiments together.
+- Inspect the strongest relevant sources directly before making strong review claims.
+- If the artifact is a paper or draft, evaluate:
+  - novelty and related-work positioning
+  - clarity of claims
+  - baseline fairness
+  - evaluation design
+  - missing ablations
+  - reproducibility details
+  - whether conclusions outrun the evidence
+- If code or experiment artifacts exist, compare them against the claimed method and evaluation.
+- Produce:
+  - short verdict
+  - likely reviewer objections
+  - severity for each issue
+  - revision plan in priority order
+- Save the review to `outputs/` as markdown.
+- End with a `Sources` section containing direct URLs for every inspected external source.