Add AI research review workflows
This commit is contained in:
17
prompts/ablate.md
Normal file
17
prompts/ablate.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
description: Design the smallest convincing ablation set for an AI research project.
|
||||
---
|
||||
Design an ablation plan for: $@
|
||||
|
||||
Requirements:
|
||||
- Identify the exact claims the paper is making.
|
||||
- For each claim, determine what ablation or control is necessary to support it.
|
||||
- Prefer the `verifier` subagent when the claim structure is complicated.
|
||||
- Distinguish:
|
||||
- must-have ablations
|
||||
- nice-to-have ablations
|
||||
- unnecessary experiments
|
||||
- Call out where benchmark norms imply mandatory controls.
|
||||
- Optimize for the minimum convincing set, not experiment sprawl.
|
||||
- Save the plan to `outputs/` as markdown if the user wants a durable artifact.
|
||||
- End with a `Sources` section containing direct URLs for any external sources used.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user