Fix workflow continuation and provider setup gaps

This commit is contained in:
Advait Paliwal
2026-04-17 09:47:38 -07:00
parent d30506c82a
commit 9841342866
28 changed files with 359 additions and 36 deletions

View File

@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ Write a paper-style draft for: $@
Derive a short slug from the topic (lowercase, hyphens, no filler words, ≤5 words). Use this slug for all files in this run.
Requirements:
- Before writing, outline the draft structure: proposed title, sections, key claims to make, source material to draw from, and a verification log for the critical claims, figures, and calculations. Write the outline to `outputs/.plans/<slug>.md`. Present the outline to the user. If this is an unattended or one-shot run, continue automatically. If the user is actively interacting, give them a brief chance to request changes before proceeding.
- Before writing, outline the draft structure: proposed title, sections, key claims to make, source material to draw from, and a verification log for the critical claims, figures, and calculations. Write the outline to `outputs/.plans/<slug>.md`. Briefly summarize the outline to the user and continue immediately. Do not ask for confirmation or wait for a proceed response unless the user explicitly requested outline review.
- Use the `writer` subagent when the draft should be produced from already-collected notes, then use the `verifier` subagent to add inline citations and verify sources.
- Include at minimum: title, abstract, problem statement, related work, method or synthesis, evidence or experiments, limitations, conclusion.
- Use clean Markdown with LaTeX where equations materially help.