Fix workflow continuation and provider setup gaps

This commit is contained in:
Advait Paliwal
2026-04-17 09:47:38 -07:00
parent d30506c82a
commit 9841342866
28 changed files with 359 additions and 36 deletions

View File

@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ Compare sources for: $@
Derive a short slug from the comparison topic (lowercase, hyphens, no filler words, ≤5 words). Use this slug for all files in this run.
Requirements:
- Before starting, outline the comparison plan: which sources to compare, which dimensions to evaluate, expected output structure. Write the plan to `outputs/.plans/<slug>.md`. Present the plan to the user. If this is an unattended or one-shot run, continue automatically. If the user is actively interacting, give them a brief chance to request changes before proceeding.
- Before starting, outline the comparison plan: which sources to compare, which dimensions to evaluate, expected output structure. Write the plan to `outputs/.plans/<slug>.md`. Briefly summarize the plan to the user and continue immediately. Do not ask for confirmation or wait for a proceed response unless the user explicitly requested plan review.
- Use the `researcher` subagent to gather source material when the comparison set is broad, and the `verifier` subagent to verify sources and add inline citations to the final matrix.
- Build a comparison matrix covering: source, key claim, evidence type, caveats, confidence.
- Generate charts with `pi-charts` when the comparison involves quantitative metrics. Use Mermaid for method or architecture comparisons.