Reframe Feynman for general research workflows

prompts/compare-sources.md

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+---
+description: Compare multiple sources on a topic and produce a source-grounded matrix of agreements, disagreements, and confidence.
+---
+Compare sources for: $@
+
+Requirements:
+- Identify the strongest relevant primary sources first.
+- Inspect the top sources directly before comparing them.
+- Build a comparison matrix covering:
+  - source
+  - key claim
+  - evidence type
+  - caveats
+  - confidence
+- Distinguish agreement, disagreement, and uncertainty clearly.
+- End with a `Sources` section containing direct URLs for every source used.
+- Save the comparison to `outputs/` as markdown if the user wants a durable artifact.

prompts/lit-review.md

@@ -10,4 +10,5 @@ Requirements:
 - Prefer primary sources and note when something appears to be a preprint or secondary summary.
 - Separate consensus, disagreements, and open questions.
 - When useful, propose concrete next experiments or follow-up reading.
+- End with a `Sources` section containing direct URLs for every paper or source used.
 - If the user wants an artifact, write the review to disk as markdown.

prompts/paper-code-audit.md

@@ -9,4 +9,5 @@ Requirements:
 - If a public repo exists, inspect it with `alpha_read_code`.
 - Compare claimed methods, defaults, metrics, and data handling against the repository.
 - Call out missing code, mismatches, ambiguous defaults, and reproduction risks.
+- End with a `Sources` section containing paper and repository URLs.
 - Save the audit to `outputs/` as markdown.

prompts/paper-draft.md

@@ -16,4 +16,5 @@ Requirements:
   - limitations
   - conclusion
 - If citations are available, include citation placeholders or references clearly enough to convert later.
+- Add a `Sources` appendix with direct URLs for all primary references used while drafting.
 - Save the draft to `papers/` as markdown.

prompts/reading-list.md

@@ -9,4 +9,5 @@ Requirements:
 - Use `alpha_ask_paper` when a paper's fit is unclear.
 - Group papers by role when useful: foundational, strongest recent work, methods, benchmarks, critiques, replication targets.
 - For each paper, explain why it is on the list.
+- Include direct URLs for each recommended source.
 - Save the final reading list to `outputs/` as markdown.

prompts/replicate.md

@@ -12,3 +12,4 @@ Requirements:
 - If enough information is available locally, implement and run the replication steps.
 - Save notes, scripts, and results to disk in a reproducible layout.
 - Be explicit about what is verified, what is inferred, and what is still missing.
+- End with a `Sources` section containing paper and repository URLs.

prompts/research-memo.md

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+---
+description: Produce a general research memo grounded in explicit sources and direct links.
+---
+Write a research memo about: $@
+
+Requirements:
+- Start by finding the strongest relevant sources.
+- Read or inspect the top sources directly before making strong claims.
+- Distinguish facts, interpretations, and open questions.
+- End with a `Sources` section containing direct URLs for every source used.
+- Save the memo to `outputs/` as markdown if the user wants a durable artifact.