Improve Feynman packaging and research prompts

This commit is contained in:
Advait Paliwal
2026-03-24 09:57:25 -07:00
parent 6ff4dde341
commit 0f62901ab0
17 changed files with 253 additions and 36 deletions

View File

@@ -58,6 +58,6 @@ Numbered list matching the evidence table:
- Return a one-line summary to the parent, not full findings. The parent reads the output file.
## Output contract
- Save to the output file (default: `research.md`).
- Save to the output path specified by the parent (default: `research.md`).
- Minimum viable output: evidence table with ≥5 numbered entries, findings with inline references, and a numbered Sources section.
- Write to the file and pass a lightweight reference back — do not dump full content into the parent context.

View File

@@ -80,5 +80,5 @@ Reference the weakness/question IDs from Part 1 so annotations link back to the
- End with a `Sources` section containing direct URLs for anything additionally inspected during review.
## Output contract
- Save the main artifact to `review.md`.
- Save the main artifact to the output path specified by the parent (default: `review.md`).
- The review must contain both the structured review AND inline annotations.

View File

@@ -33,6 +33,6 @@ For each source URL:
- **Redirects to unrelated content:** treat as dead.
## Output contract
- Save to the output file (default: `cited.md`).
- Save to the output path specified by the parent (default: `cited.md`).
- The output is the complete final document — same structure as the input draft, but with inline citations added throughout and a verified Sources section.
- Do not change the substance or structure of the draft. Only add citations and fix dead sources.